Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
Therapeutic inertia and contributing factors among ambulatory patients with hypertension.
Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence and treatment and control rates of hypertension among Chinese adults from 2016 to 2022: a meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Low-Dose Triple-Pill of Telmisartan, Amlodipine, and Indapamide for Initial Hypertension Treatment: A GRADE-Assessed Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Pooled it
- Antihypertensive Medication Patterns in Patients with Hypertension that is Harder to Control: Insights from the EnligHTN Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Clinical inertia in cardiovascular risk management: prevalence, associated factors, and impact on outcomes of the OPM study.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Blood Pressure Outcomes Among US Veterans Initiating Hypertension Treatment, 2014 to 2023.Circulation. Population health and outcomes · 2026Article
- Leveraging the Electronic Health Record to Identify and Manage Resistant Hypertension.Current hypertension reports · 2026Review
- Heart Failure in Older Adults: Real-World Outcomes and Patient Profiles by Admission Service and Sex.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to hypertension among Sri Lankans: an online cross-sectional survey.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Real-Life Growth Hormone Treatment Patterns in Children from China: A Report from Two Databases.Advances in therapy · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTherapeutic inertia refers to the failure of healthcare providers to initiate or intensify therapy based on current evidence-based guidelines, even when the desired treatment goal is not achieved. Despite poorly controlled hypertension, clinicians often hesitate to intensify treatment. Therapeutic inertia is currently receiving more attention as a significant reason for clinicians' inability to effectively manage hypertension. However, in our setting, there is limited knowledge about therapeutic inertia and its contributing factors.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate therapeutic inertia and contributing factors among ambulatory patients with hypertension.
methodA prospective observational study was conducted at the cardiac clinic of Ayder comprehensive specialized hospital in the Tigray region of northern Ethiopia. Patients were recruited into the study during their medication refilling appointments using a simple random sampling technique. All patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months to assess therapeutic inertia, which was defined as the healthcare providers' failure to initiate or intensify therapy based on current evidence-based guidelines when therapeutic goals were not achieved. Data were collected through patient interviews and review of their medical records. We utilized binary logistic regression analysis to determine factors associated with therapeutic inertia.
resultThe study included 282 participants, with an equal male-to-female ratio. The mean age of the participants was 56.6 ± 12.3 years. Among all participants, a majority (67.4%) had uncontrolled hypertension. The study revealed that 72% of patients with uncontrolled hypertension experienced therapeutic inertia. In response to this issue, we recommended dose escalation for 73% of the patients and the initiation of additional drug therapy for 27% of them. Multivariable analysis indicated that having three or more medications (AOR = 4.74, 95%CI = 1.94-11.61) and having stage II hypertension (AOR = 3.06, 95%CI = 1.32-7.08) were identified as independent predictors of therapeutic inertia.
conclusionThe findings of our study indicated that a large proportion of the patients had poorly controlled hypertension, and a significant number of these patients also demonstrated therapeutic inertia. The number of medications and stage II hypertension were identified as independent predictors of therapeutic inertia. Therefore, it is crucial to prioritize patients at risk of therapeutic inertia and provide them with additional support. Moreover, practice based training should be given to clinicians in order to enhance treatment intensification and overall treatment outcome among ambulatory patients with hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.