ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
Predictors and clinical outcomes of slow flow phenomenon in diabetic patients with chronic coronary syndrome.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronary slow flow phenomenon: a meta-analysis of clinical risk predictors.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- The Role of Prognostic Nutritional Index in Predicting Coronary Slow Flow Phenomena.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary slow flow (CSF) is characterized by late distal coronary perfusion of coronary arteries at the time of angiography despite the vessels appearing normal. The importance of CSF is still debatable. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate CSF's predictors and clinical outcomes in diabetic patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). PATIENT AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 250 diabetic patients diagnosed with chronic stable angina and referred for coronary angiography (CAG), showing normal coronaries with CSF (Group I) and 240 diabetic patients with normal coronaries and normal flow (Group II). The patients in both groups were followed up for one year to evaluate clinical outcomes.
resultsThe incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was higher in Group I than in Group II, but the difference was not statistically significant except when the composite endpoints of STEMI, NSTEMI, and unstable angina were combined under the term ACS. The independent predictors of CSF, as detected by multivariate regression analysis, were body mass index (BMI) (OR = 0.694, 95% CI = 0.295-0.842, P = 0.010), blood glucose during catheterization (OR = 0.647, 95% CI = 0.298-0.874, P = 0.008), serum triglycerides (OR = 0.574, 95% CI = 0.289-0.746, P = 0.010), and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR = 0.618, 95% CI = 0.479-0.892, P = 0.001).
conclusionSerum triglyceride levels, BMI, NLR, and high blood glucose levels at the time of catheterization were independent predictors of CSF in diabetic patients. MACE levels were higher in diabetic patients with CSF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.