ArticleScientific reports2024
Effect of endothelium on the anticoagulant activity of a covalent antithrombin-heparin complex.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed a covalent antithrombin-heparin complex (ATH) with superior In vivo anticoagulant efficacy compared to non-covalent antithrombin (AT) + unfractionated heparin (H). Previous in vitro studies of ATH, investigating the mechanisms behind its efficacy, were done in the absence of endothelium. Since the endothelial surface modulates hemostasis, we investigated its impact on the in vitro anticoagulant properties of ATH and AT+H. Discontinuous second order rate constant enzyme inhibition assays, fibrin formation, and plasma clot generation were performed in the presence of ATH or AT+H, with and without endothelium present. ATH had an increased rate of direct inhibition of IIa and Xa, and increased inhibition of IIa-induced fibrin formation, compared to AT+H. When compared at equal anti-Xa levels, ATH was less effective than AT+H at catalyzing inhibition of plasma clot generation. These results were found in both the presence and absence of endothelium. Endothelium decreased the rate of IIa inhibition, and reduced clot time in IIa-induced fibrin formation and plasma clot generation assays, for both ATH and AT+H. Endothelium did not impact the activity of ATH differently to AT+H. This supports the growing body of evidence suggesting ATH may be a beneficial anticoagulant for potential clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.