Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333681›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Explainability of CNN-based Alzheimer's disease detection from online handwriting.

Jana Sweidan, Mounim A El-Yacoubi, Anne-Sophie Rigaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jana SweidanSamovar/Télécom SudParis, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120, Palaiseau, France.
Mounim A El-YacoubiSamovar/Télécom SudParis, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120, Palaiseau, France. mounim.el_yacoubi@telecom-sudparis.eu.
Anne-Sophie RigaudAP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Cochin Paris Centre, Hôpital Broca, Pôle Gérontologie, 75005, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With over 55 million people globally affected by dementia and nearly 10 million new cases reported annually, Alzheimer's disease is a prevalent and challenging neurodegenerative disorder. Despite significant advancements in machine learning techniques for Alzheimer's disease detection, the widespread adoption of deep learning models raises concerns about their explainability. The lack of explainability in deep learning models for online handwriting analysis is a critical gap in the literature in the context of Alzheimer's disease detection. This paper addresses this challenge by interpreting predictions from a Convolutional Neural Network applied to multivariate time series data, generated by online handwriting data associated with continuous loop series handwritten on a graphical tablet. Our explainability methods reveal distinct motor behavior characteristics for healthy individuals and those diagnosed with Alzheimer's. Healthy subjects exhibited consistent, smooth movements, while Alzheimer's patients demonstrated erratic patterns marked by abrupt stops and direction changes. This emphasizes the critical role of explainability in translating complex models into clinically relevant insights. Our research contributes to the enhancement of early diagnosis, providing significant and reliable insights to stakeholders involved in patient care and intervention strategies. Our work bridges the gap between machine learning predictions and clinical insights, fostering a more effective and understandable application of advanced models for Alzheimer's disease assessment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDeep LearningHandwritingNeural Networks, ComputerAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle Aged1D-CNNAlzheimer’s diseaseExplainabilityOnline handwriting

Identifiers

PMID39333681
PMCPMC11436813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.