ArticleScientific reports2024
Interpretable machine learning for allergic rhinitis prediction among preschool children in Urumqi, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors for allergic rhinitis in preschool children: a meta-analysis and systematic review.BMC pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology With Environmental Exposures.Allergy · 2026Review
- Enhanced Early Detection of Allergic Rhinitis: A Prospective Study on a Symptom-Based Predictive Model.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- Prediction of allergic disease trajectories from birth up to adolescence.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Article
- The nasal-oral microbiome axis in allergic rhinitis: environmental triggers, microbial dysbiosis, and immune dysregulation.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric allergy research.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility in allergic rhinitis management: Systematic review.Annals of thoracic medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the advantages and applications of machine learning models in predicting the risk of allergic rhinitis (AR) in children aged 2-8, compared to traditional logistic regression. The study analyzed questionnaire data from 7131 children aged 2-8, which was randomly divided into training, validation, and testing sets in a ratio of 55:15:30, repeated 100 times. Predictor variables included parental allergy, medical history during the child's first year (cfy), and early life environmental factors. The time of first onset of AR was restricted to after the age of 1 year to establish a clear temporal relationship between the predictor variables and the outcome. Feature engineering utilized the chi-square test and the Boruta algorithm, refining the dataset for analysis. The construction utilized Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting Tree (XGBoost) as the models. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and the optimal decision threshold was determined by weighing multiple metrics on the validation sets and reporting results on the testing set. Additionally, the strengths and limitations of the different models were comprehensively analyzed by stratifying gender, mode of birth, and age subgroups, as well as by varying the number of predictor variables. Furthermore, methods such as Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and purity of node partition in Random Forest were employed to assess feature importance, along with exploring model stability through alterations in the number of features. In this study, 7131 children aged 2-8 were analyzed, with 524 (7.35%) diagnosed with AR, with an onset age ranging from 2 to 8 years. Optimal parameters were refined using the validation set, and a rigorous process of 100 random divisions and repeated training ensured robust evaluation of the models on the testing set. The model construction involved incorporating fourteen variables, including the history of allergy-related diseases during the child's first year, familial genetic factors, and early-life indoor environmental factors. The performance of LR, SVM, RF, and XGBoost on the unstratified data test set was 0.715 (standard deviation = 0.023), 0.723 (0.022), 0.747 (0.015), and 0.733 (0.019), respectively; the performance of each model was stable on the stratified data, and the RF performance was significantly better than that of LR (paired samples t-test: p < 0.001). Different techniques for evaluating the importance of features showed that the top5 variables were father or mother with AR, having older siblings, history of food allergy and father's educational level. Utilizing strategies like stratification and adjusting the number of features, this study constructed a random forest model that outperforms traditional logistic regression. Specifically designed to detect the occurrence of allergic rhinitis (AR) in children aged 2-8, the model incorporates parental allergic history and early life environmental factors. The selection of the optimal cut-off value was determined through a comprehensive evaluation strategy. Additionally, we identified the top 5 crucial features that greatly influence the model's performance. This study serves as a valuable reference for implementing machine learning-based AR prediction in pediatric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.