ArticleScientific reports2024
Length-scale study in deep learning prediction for non-small cell lung cancer brain metastasis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI and the digital pathology revolution: clinical applications in cancer diagnosis and assessment.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2026Review
- Computational Pathology with Topological signatures and Visual Word Encoding.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning-assisted digital pathology has demonstrated the potential to profoundly impact clinical practice, even surpassing human pathologists in performance. However, as deep neural network (DNN) architectures grow in size and complexity, their explainability decreases, posing challenges in interpreting pathology features for broader clinical insights into physiological diseases. To better assess the interpretability of digital microscopic images and guide future microscopic system design, we developed a novel method to study the predictive feature length-scale that underpins a DNN's predictive power. We applied this method to analyze a DNN's capability in predicting brain metastasis from early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer biopsy slides. This study quantifies DNN's attention for brain metastasis prediction, targeting features at both the cellular scale and tissue scale in H&E-stained histological whole slide images. At the cellular scale, the predictive power of DNNs progressively increases with higher resolution and significantly decreases when the resolvable feature length exceeds 5 microns. Additionally, DNN uses more macro-scale features associated with tissue architecture and is optimized when assessing visual fields greater than 41 microns. Our study computes the length-scale requirements for optimal DNN learning on digital whole-slide microscopic images, holding the promise to guide future optical microscope designs in pathology applications and facilitating downstream deep learning analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.