Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333580›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Longitudinal bi-criteria framework for assessing national healthcare responses to pandemic outbreaks.

Adel Guitouni, Nabil Belacel, Loubna Benabbou, Belaid Moa, Munire Erman, Halim Abdul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adel GuitouniGustavson School of Business, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. adelg@uvic.ca.
Nabil BelacelDigital Technologies Research Center, National Research Council, Ottawa, ON, Canada. nabil.belacel@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1731-3225
Loubna BenabbouDepartment of Management Sciences, Universite du Quebec a Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, Canada.
Belaid MoaAdvanced Computing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Munire ErmanRespiratory Therapy, Medical Day Care, Cancer Care, Social Work, Maternity and Pediatrics Units, Campbell River General Hospital, Campbell River, BC, Canada.
Halim AbdulDepartment of Economics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) under the COVID-19 Rapid Research FO - Social Policy and Public Health Responses grant (#.VR5 172669) CDTS-101-01Gouvernement du Canada | National Research Council Canada (Conseil national de recherches Canada) CDTS-101-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pandemics like COVID-19 have illuminated the significant disparities in the performance of national healthcare systems (NHCSs) during rapidly evolving crises. The challenge of comparing NHCS performance has been a difficult topic in the literature. To address this gap, our study introduces a bi-criteria longitudinal algorithm that merges fuzzy clustering with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This new approach provides a comprehensive and dynamic assessment of NHCS performance and efficiency during the early phase of the pandemic. By categorizing each NHCS as an efficient performer, inefficient performer, efficient underperformer, or inefficient underperformer, our analysis vividly represents performance dynamics, clearly identifying the top and bottom performers within each cluster of countries. Our methodology offers valuable insights for performance evaluation and benchmarking, with significant implications for enhancing pandemic response strategies. The study's findings are discussed from theoretical and practical perspectives, offering guidance for future health system assessments and policy-making.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health CarePandemicsAlgorithmsBenchmarkingFuzzy LogicHumansLongitudinal StudiesSARS-CoV-2Bi-criteria analysisCOVID-19 pandemicData envelopment analysisFuzzy clusteringHealthcare performance evaluationLongitudinal analysis

Identifiers

PMID39333580
PMCPMC11436803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.