Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333570›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Deep-learning model accurately classifies multi-label lung ultrasound findings, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement.

Daeeon Hong, Hyewon Choi, Wonju Hong, Yisak Kim, Tae Jung Kim, Jinwook Choi, Sang-Bae Ko, Chang Min Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pneumothorax and Hemothorax: Practical Approaches for Radiologists.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daeeon HongDepartment of Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, 1, Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Hyewon ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 06973, Republic of Korea.
Wonju HongDepartment of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, 22, Gwanpyeong-Ro 170, Beon-gil, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068, Republic of Korea.
Yisak KimDepartment of Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, 1, Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Tae Jung KimDepartment of Neurology and Department of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Jinwook ChoiDepartment of Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, 1, Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Bae KoDepartment of Neurology and Department of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. sangbai1378@gmail.com.
Chang Min ParkDepartment of Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, 1, Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. morphius@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the increasing use of lung ultrasound (LUS) in the evaluation of respiratory disease, operators' competence constrains its effectiveness. We developed a deep-learning (DL) model for multi-label classification using LUS and validated its performance and efficacy on inter-reader variability. We retrospectively collected LUS and labeled as normal, B-line, consolidation, and effusion from patients undergoing thoracentesis at a tertiary institution between January 2018 and January 2022. The development and internal testing involved 7580 images from January 2018 and December 2020, and the model's performance was validated on a temporally separated test set (n = 985 images collected after January 2021) and two external test sets (n = 319 and 54 images). Two radiologists interpreted LUS with and without DL assistance and compared diagnostic performance and agreement. The model demonstrated robust performance with AUCs: 0.93 (95% CI 0.92-0.94) for normal, 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.89) for B-line, 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.86) for consolidation, and 0.94 (95% CI 0.93-0.95) for effusion. The model improved reader accuracy for binary discrimination (normal vs. abnormal; reader 1: 87.5-95.6%, p = 0.004; reader 2: 95.0-97.5%, p = 0.19), and agreement (k = 0.73-0.83, p = 0.01). In conclusion, the DL-based model may assist interpretation, improving accuracy and overcoming operator competence limitations in LUS.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLungUltrasonographyAdultAgedFemaleHumansLung DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceClassificationThoraxUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39333570
PMCPMC11437088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.