Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333563›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Seed morphometrics unravels the evolutionary history of grapevine in France.

L Bouby, V Bonhomme, S Ivorra, R Bacilieri, S Ben Makhad, E Bonnaire, M Cabanis, M Derreumaux, M F Dietsch-Sellami, F Durand and 22 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

L BoubyISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France. laurent.bouby@umontpellier.fr.
V BonhommeISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
S IvorraISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
R BacilieriAGAP Institut, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, UMT Géno-Vigne, Montpellier, France.
S Ben MakhadAASPE, UMR 7209, CNRS-MNHN, Paris, France.
E BonnaireAASPE, UMR 7209, CNRS-MNHN, Paris, France.
M CabanisInrap, Institut national de recherches archéologiques préventives, cellule économie végétale et environnement, Paris, France.
M DerreumauxAASPE, UMR 7209, CNRS-MNHN, Paris, France.
M F Dietsch-SellamiInrap, Institut national de recherches archéologiques préventives, cellule économie végétale et environnement, Paris, France.
F DurandInrap, Institut national de recherches archéologiques préventives, cellule économie végétale et environnement, Paris, France.
A EvinISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
I FigueiralISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
L FlottesArcheodunum, Lyon, France.
C HallavantHADES, Toulouse, France.
F JedrusiakARSCAN, UMR 7041, CNRS, Université Paris I, Université Paris Nanterre, Ministère Culture, Nanterre, France.
T LacombeAGAP Institut, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, UMT Géno-Vigne, Montpellier, France.
P MarinvalASM, University Paul Valéry-Montpellier 3, CNRS, MCC, Inrap, Montpellier, France.
L MartinLaboratoire d'archéologie préhistorique et anthropologie, Université de Genève, Genève, Switzerland.
V MatterneAASPE, UMR 7209, CNRS-MNHN, Paris, France.
C PagnouxAASPE, UMR 7209, CNRS-MNHN, Paris, France.
T PastorISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
R PinaudASM, University Paul Valéry-Montpellier 3, CNRS, MCC, Inrap, Montpellier, France.
B PradatAASPE, UMR 7209, CNRS-MNHN, Paris, France.
S PreissInstitut Royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Bruxelles, Belgium.
J RosISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
N RoviraASM, University Paul Valéry-Montpellier 3, CNRS, MCC, Inrap, Montpellier, France.
M P RuasAASPE, UMR 7209, CNRS-MNHN, Paris, France.
C SchaalInrap, Institut national de recherches archéologiques préventives, cellule économie végétale et environnement, Paris, France.
M TillierASM, University Paul Valéry-Montpellier 3, CNRS, MCC, Inrap, Montpellier, France.
F ToulemondeAASPE, UMR 7209, CNRS-MNHN, Paris, France.
J WietholdInrap, Institut national de recherches archéologiques préventives, cellule économie végétale et environnement, Paris, France.
J F TerralISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CE27-0013Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-22-CE27-0026European Research Council 852573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cultivation of grapevines has spanned millennia, leading to thousands of varieties through exchanges, mutations, and crosses between genotypes, as well probably as gene flow from wild populations. These varieties are typically categorized by regional origin and primary use, either for wine production or fruit consumption. France, within the Western European group, hosts many of the world's renowned wine grape varieties. However, the historical development of cultivated grapevines in France and in the world remains poorly understood. This study applies morphometry on 19,377 charred and waterlogged archaeological grape pips to investigate the evolutionary history of grapevine in France over the last 10,000 years. The study compares seed outlines and lengths, corrected for taphonomic distortions, with a reference collection of 80 wild and 466 modern domestic grapevine accessions. Findings reveal a shift from wild grapevine exploitation to the expansion of domestic varieties around 600-500 BCE, coinciding with Mediterranean cultural influences and the introduction of eastern grape types. The identification of the East-Table group, a group of varieties of eastern origin for fruit consumption, indicates that grapes were also grown for food, especially in Mediterranean regions and near urban areas, alongside wine production. Early French viticulture featured a notable presence of Western European wine-type grapevines. The abundance of pips with wild-like morphology suggests early cultivation involved plants at an initial domestication stage and gene flow between introduced and wild grapevines. As viticulture spread northward, wild and Eastern morphotypes declined, leading to the dominance of Western European wine types in inner France during the Middle Ages.

Indexed as

SeedsVitisBiological EvolutionFranceGene FlowWineArchaeobotanyDiffusionDomesticationMorphometricsPerennial plantTaphonomyVitis vinifera

Identifiers

PMID39333563
PMCPMC11437209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.