ArticleScientific reports2024
Detection of cardiovascular disease cases using advanced tree-based machine learning algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- CardioMetaHybridOptimizer as a behaviorally adaptive multi-phase metaheuristic framework for interpretable cardiovascular disease diagnosis.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Innovative statistical method for longitudinal and hierarchical data modeling: the GMEXGBoost method.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Exploring the interaction between klotho and TyG index in cardiovascular risk stratification: A metabolic-inflammatory network analysis with mediation and machine learning insights.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Intersectional approaches to cognitive aging: a practical guide to modeling heterogeneous trajectories with GLMM-trees.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Identification of cardiovascular disease in patients with kidney stone disease using explainable machine learning.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Application of generalized linear mixed effects random forest for identifying risk factors of prediabetes in Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unlocking the link: predicting cardiovascular disease risk with a focus on airflow obstruction using machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) can often lead to serious consequences such as death or disability. This study aims to identify a tree-based machine learning method with the best performance criteria for the detection of CVD. This study analyzed data collected from 9,499 participants, with a focus on 38 different variables. The target variable was the presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the villages were considered as the cluster variable. The standard tree, random forest, Generalized Linear Mixed Model tree (GLMM tree), and Generalized Mixed Effect random forest (GMERF) were fitted to the data and the estimated prediction power indices were compared to identify the best approach. According to the analysis of important variables in all models, five variables (age, LDL, history of cardiac disease in first-degree relatives, physical activity level, and presence of hypertension) were identified as the most influential in predicting CVD. Fitting the decision tree, random forest, GLMM tree, and GMERF, respectively, resulted in an area under the ROC curve of 0.56, 0.73, 0.78, and 0.80. The GMERF model demonstrated the best predictive performance among the fitted models based on evaluation criteria. Regarding the clustered structure of the data, using relevant machine-learning approaches that account for this clustering may result in more accurate predicting indices and targeted prevention frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.