Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333544›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparative study of influence of Cu, CuO nanoparticles and Cu

Małgorzata Garncarek-Musiał, Agnieszka Maruszewska, Monika Kowalska-Góralska, Ewa Mijowska, Klaudia Zielinkiewicz, Katarzyna Dziewulska

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Biogenic copper and copper oxide nanoparticles to combat multidrug-resistantBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Małgorzata Garncarek-MusiałDoctoral School, Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Mickiewicza 18, Szczecin, 70- 383, Poland.
Agnieszka MaruszewskaInstitute of Biology, Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c, Szczecin, 71-412, Poland.
Monika Kowalska-GóralskaFaculty of Biology and Animal Science, Department of Limnology and Fishery, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Chełmońskiego 38c, Wrocław, 51-630, Poland.
Ewa MijowskaSzczecin Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Department of Nanomaterials Physicochemistry, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Piastow Ave. 45, Szczecin, 70-310, Poland.
Klaudia ZielinkiewiczSzczecin Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Department of Nanomaterials Physicochemistry, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Piastow Ave. 45, Szczecin, 70-310, Poland.
Katarzyna DziewulskaInstitute of Biology, Department of Hydrobiology, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c, Szczecin, 71-412, Poland. katarzyna.dziewulska@usz.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The same elements can yield disparate nanoproducts that may elicit different harmful effects in cells and organisms. This study aimed to compare the effects of copper (Cu NPs) and copper oxide (CuO NPs) nanoparticles and Cu

Indexed as

ApoptosisCopperMembrane Potential, MitochondrialMetal NanoparticlesOncorhynchus mykissReactive Oxygen SpeciesSpermatozoaAnimalsMaleCoppercupric oxidecuprous oxideReactive Oxygen SpeciesFish spermatozoaMMPNanocopperNanotoxicologyROS, apoptosis

Identifiers

PMID39333544
PMCPMC11437131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.