Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333447›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2025

A Narrative Review of Pain in Pediatric Oncology: The Opioid Option for Procedural and Surgical Pain.

Elizabeth A Hall, Chasity M Shelton, Tracy M Hagemann, Hilary M Jasmin, Karissa Grey, Doralina L Anghelescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth A HallDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA. liz.hall@uthsc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8545-6917
Chasity M SheltonDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9141-3617
Tracy M HagemannDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5715-9173
Hilary M JasminHealth Sciences Library, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5115-1365
Karissa GreyCollege of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Doralina L AnghelescuDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8521-2744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review examines the evolving role of opioids in managing procedural and surgical pain in pediatric oncology patients. The review evaluates studies on opioid use across various oncological surgeries including thoracic, abdominal, orthopedic, and neurosurgical procedures, as well as for common painful procedures such as bone marrow aspirations and lumbar punctures. While opioids remain important for acute procedural and postoperative pain management in pediatric oncology patients, there is an increasing emphasis on multimodal, opioid-sparing approaches. The evidence presented within this review highlights the growing focus on judicious postoperative opioid prescribing to mitigate risks of adverse effects and persistent use or potential misuse. The review synthesizes findings from studies investigating various analgesic regimens, including the use of regional anesthesia techniques like epidural analgesia and peripheral nerve blocks, which have shown promise in reducing opioid requirements. For procedural pain, the review explores the efficacy of combining opioids with sedatives like midazolam or propofol, as well as the potential of ketamine as an opioid-sparing alternative. Key findings indicate that opioid-sparing techniques can effectively reduce overall opioid consumption without compromising pain control or patient satisfaction. Several studies demonstrated that regional anesthesia techniques and non-opioid adjuncts can significantly lower postoperative opioid requirements across various surgical procedures. For procedural pain, ketamine-based regimens often showed comparable or superior pain control to opioid-based approaches, with some studies reporting better patient satisfaction. This review also addresses the importance of tailored postoperative opioid prescribing, with some studies presenting algorithms to predict outpatient opioid needs more accurately. These approaches aim to ensure adequate pain control while minimizing excess opioid dispensing.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidNeoplasmsPostoperative PainProcedural PainChildHumansPain ManagementAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID39333447
PMCPMC11775022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.