ArticleRadiological physics and technology2024
The effect on gastrointestinal peristalsis for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography during breath-holding methods.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The breath-hold (BH) 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography method has been reported to suppress "respiratory artifacts"; however, the influence of gastrointestinal peristalsis around the target organs has not been discussed. In contrast, the autonomic nervous system has been reported to affect gastrointestinal peristalsis and BH imaging has been reported to influence venous blood flow signal (BFS) through its involvement with the autonomic nervous system. We examined the impact of BH imaging on gastrointestinal peristalsis. Seven healthy volunteers participated. Three respiratory patterns-free breathing (FB), BH at maximum inspiration (Insp-BH), and BH at maximum expiration (Exp-BH)-were used. Gastrointestinal peristalsis was measured using cine MRI. Cine MRI data were analyzed using the normalized interframe difference method, focusing on the duodenum and gastric body. Hemodynamic changes resulting from BH methods were evaluated using 2D phase contrast, targeting the inferior vena cava (IVC). The BFS was examined for all phases of each respiratory pattern. Peristalsis variation in the duodenum showed no significant differences among FB, Exp-BH, and Insp-BH. In the gastric body, no significant differences were observed between FB and Exp-BH or between Exp-BH and Insp-BH. However, a significant difference emerged between FB and Insp-BH. Regarding BFS, in the IVC, significant differences were observed between Exp-BH and Insp-BH and between FB and Insp-BH (both, p < 0.01), with no significant difference between FB and Exp-BH. Insp-BH reduces venous blood flow and suppresses the influence of peristalsis variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39333442What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.