ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024
Factors Associated to the Presence of Isthmocele Diagnosed by Pelvic Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Diagnostic Hysteroscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Investigating the clinical manifestations associated with isthmocele: a meta-analysis study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of obstetric and surgical factors on isthmocele development: insights from a prospective cohort study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Prevalence of isthmocele according to diagnostic hysteroscopy, transvaginal ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging in non-pregnant women: cross-sectional study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to analyze the prevalence of isthmocele and factors associated with its onset within a cohort of women with previous history of cesarean section. A cross-sectional study with 90 women assessed from 2020 to 2022. Isthmocele was a composite variable diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or diagnostic hysteroscopy (DxHys) and were asked about clinical symptoms, sociodemographic and obstetrical history and quality of life by the WHO-QOL questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analysis (odds ratio (OR) plus 95% confidence intervals-CI) were performed to seek factors associated with the presence of isthmocele (5% significance level).The prevalence of isthmocele after combining MRI, TVUS and DxHys was 63.3% (n = 57). Women with isthmocele presented a higher body mass index (BMI) measured during delivery (32.70 ± 6.07 vs. 28.28 ± 9.86 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
39333436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.