Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333380›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Animal pollination contributes to more than half of citrus production.

Marcos Monasterolo, Andrés F Ramírez-Mejía, Pablo Cavigliasso, Pablo Schliserman, Valentina Chavanne, Claudia M Carro, Natacha P Chacoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcos MonasteroloCentro regional de Energía y Ambiente para el Desarrollo Sustentable (CREAS), CONICET- Universidad Nacional de Catamarca, Catamarca, Argentina.
Andrés F Ramírez-MejíaInstituto de Ecología Regional, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán - CONICET, Tucumán, Argentina. andresfeliper.mejia@gmail.com.
Pablo CavigliassoGrupo de Gestión Ambiental, Conservación y Manejo de suelos y agua, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez - Córdoba, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pablo SchlisermanCentro regional de Energía y Ambiente para el Desarrollo Sustentable (CREAS), CONICET- Universidad Nacional de Catamarca, Catamarca, Argentina.
Valentina ChavanneFacultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina.
Claudia M CarroFacultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina.
Natacha P ChacoffInstituto de Ecología Regional, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán - CONICET, Tucumán, Argentina.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación PICT-2018-02508Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación PICT-2021-00092Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas PIO/2015-1520150100023CO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal pollination is crucial for the reproduction and economic viability of a wide range of crops. Despite the existing data, the extent to which citrus crops depend on pollinators to guarantee fruit production still needs to be determined. Here, we described the composition of potential pollinators in citrus (Citrus spp.) from the main growing areas of Argentina; moreover, we combined Bayesian models and empirical simulations to assess the contribution of animal pollination on fruit set and yield ha

Indexed as

CitrusFlowersPollinationAnimalsArgentinaBayes TheoremBeesCrops, AgriculturalFruitCitrus fruitCrop yieldFood cropsFruit setPollination servicePollinator-dependent crops

Identifiers

PMID39333380
PMCPMC11437169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.