ArticleScientific reports2024
Subtracting the background by reducing cell-free DNA's confounding effects on Mycobacterium tuberculosis quantitation and the sputum microbiome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA characterisation in people with tuberculosis (TB) is critical for diagnostic and microbiome evaluations. However, extracellular DNA, more frequent in people on chemotherapy, confounds results. We evaluated whether nucleic acid dyes [propidium monoazide (PMA), PEMAX] and DNaseI could reduce this. PCR [16S Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (Mtb) qPCR, Xpert MTB/RIF] was done on dilution series of untreated and treated (PMA, PEMAX, DNaseI) Mtb. Separately, 16S rRNA gene qPCR and sequencing were done on untreated and treated sputa before (Cohort A: 11 TB-negatives, 9 TB-positives; Cohort B: 19 TB-positives, PEMAX only) and 24-weeks after chemotherapy (Cohort B). PMA and PEMAX reduced PCR-detected Mtb DNA for dilution series and Cohort A sputum versus untreated controls, suggesting non-intact Mtb is present before treatment-start. PEMAX enabled sequencing-based Mycobacterium-detection in 7/12 (58%) TB-positive sputa where no such reads otherwise occurred. In Cohort A, PMA- and PEMAX-treated versus untreated sputa had decreased α- and increased β-diversities. In Cohort B, β-diversity differences between timepoints were only detected with PEMAX. DNaseI had negligible effects. PMA and PEMAX (but not DNaseI) reduced extracellular DNA in PCR and improved pathogen detection by sequencing. PEMAX additionally detected chemotherapy-associated taxonomic changes that would otherwise be missed. Dyes enhance microbiome evaluations especially during chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.