ArticleScientific reports2024
A two-stage subsynchronous oscillation assessment method for DFIG-based wind farm grid-connected system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robust direct voltage control of stand-alone DFIG wind systems using a fractional-order fuzzy logic approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the power system, the wind farm based on Doubly-Fed Induction Generator (DFIG) may lead to Subsynchronous Oscillation (SSO), which poses a challenge to the stability of the power grid. In order to accurately evaluate SSO, this paper proposes a new evaluation method. It is divided into two main stages: firstly, the interference level of Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) data is identified by using the classification model based on Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) and Double Deep Q Network (DDQN). Then, an SSO parameter estimation model based on Local Feature Fusion Transformer (LFF-Transformer) network is designed for data with different interference levels. Experimental results show that the errors of eRMSE-f and EMAPE-F are 0.001 and 0.003 respectively, and the errors of eRMSE-δ and EMAPE-δ are 0.009 and 0.015 respectively. In terms of training and testing time, this method is 90 s and 18 s respectively, which is significantly better than Multi-SVR and Multi-CNN. After application, the frequency deviation decreased from 0.05 to 0.02 Hz, the voltage deviation decreased from 3.5 to 1.5%, the power fluctuation decreased from 10 to 5 MW, the SSO frequency decreased from 1.5 Hz to less than 0.5 Hz, and the SSO damping ratio increased from 0.08 to 0.15. This shows that the proposed method effectively increases the stability of the power grid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.