Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333329›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Impact of a deep learning-based brain CT interpretation algorithm on clinical decision-making for intracranial hemorrhage in the emergency department.

So Yeon Choi, Ji Hoon Kim, Hyun Soo Chung, Sona Lim, Eun Hwa Kim, Arom Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

So Yeon Choi *Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hoon Kim *Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Soo ChungDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Sona LimCONNECT-AI Research Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Eun Hwa KimBiostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei Biomedical Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Arom ChoiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. aromchoi@yuhs.ac.

Funding

the Medical AI Clinic Program through the National IT Industry Promotion Agency, the Ministry of Science and ICT H0124-23-1006the Medical AI Clinic Program through the National IT Industry Promotion Agency, the Ministry of Science and ICT S1313-22-1003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial hemorrhage is a critical emergency that requires prompt and accurate diagnosis in the emergency department (ED). Deep learning technology can assist in interpreting non-enhanced brain CT scans, but its real-world impact on clinical decision-making is uncertain. This study assessed a deep learning-based intracranial hemorrhage detection algorithm (DLHD) in a simulated clinical environment with ten emergency medical professionals from a tertiary hospital's ED. The participants reviewed CT scans with clinical information in two steps: without and with DLHD. Diagnostic performance was measured, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Consistency in clinical decision-making was evaluated using the kappa statistic. The results demonstrated that DLHD minimally affected experienced participants' diagnostic performance and decision-making. In contrast, inexperienced participants exhibited significantly increased sensitivity (59.33-72.67%, p < 0.001) and decreased specificity (65.49-53.73%, p < 0.001) with the algorithm. Clinical decision-making consistency was moderate among inexperienced professionals (k = 0.425) and higher among experienced ones (k = 0.738). Inexperienced participants changed their decisions more frequently, mainly due to the algorithm's false positives. The study highlights the need for thorough evaluation and careful integration of deep learning tools into clinical workflows, especially for less experienced professionals.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsClinical Decision-MakingDeep LearningEmergency Service, HospitalIntracranial HemorrhagesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityBrain computed TomographyDeep learning-based assistive algorithmEmergency Medical professionalsIntracranial hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID39333329
PMCPMC11436911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.