Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333305›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A privacy-preserving expert system for collaborative medical diagnosis across multiple institutions using federated learning.

S Markkandan, N P G Bhavani, Srigitha S Nath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S MarkkandanSchool of Electronics Engineering (SENSE), Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. markkandan.s@vit.ac.in.
N P G BhavaniDepartment of ECE, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, 602105, India.
Srigitha S NathECE, Saveetha Engineering College, Saveetha Nagar, Thandalam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602105, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expert system recommendation assists the healthcare system to develop in real-time monitoring and diagnosis of patient conditions over several healthcare institutions. Privacy concerns, however, present significant problems since patient data leaks can lead to big effects including financial losses for hospitals and invasions of personal privacy for people. To address these issues, the research introduces a privacy-preserving collaborative medical diagnosis (CMD) method on a federated learning (FL). FL maintains patient privacy and data localization by spreading only model parameters, therefore enabling training models on remote datasets. The combination of Partially Homomorphic Cryptosystem (PHC) and Residual Learning based Deep Belief Network (RDBN) ensures an accurate and safe classification of patient physiological data. Experimental results show that the proposed method is successful in maintaining the diagnostic accuracy over numerous healthcare institutions and protecting privacy. The results show that the RDBN and PHC computations requires around 1000 ms and 150 ms, respectively for classification and privacy; the data transmission from the user to server and from server to user is 5 MB and 4 MB, respectively. Finally with a 30% reduction in overhead, the proposed approach offers an average increase in classification accuracy of 10% over multiple datasets.

Indexed as

PrivacyAlgorithmsComputer SecurityExpert SystemsHumansDeep learningFederated learningHomomorphic encryptionMedical diagnosisPrivacy-preserving

Identifiers

PMID39333305
PMCPMC11437101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.