ArticleScientific reports2024
Intelligent vehicle lateral control strategy research based on feedforward + predictive LQR algorithm with GA optimisation and PID compensation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on Takeover Safety of Intelligent Vehicles Based on Accident Scenarios in Real-Vehicle Testing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Optimization control of all-terrain rescue lift vehicle safety performance based on state feedback.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Targeting the lateral motion control problem in the intelligent vehicle autopilot structural system, this paper proposes a feedforward + predictive LQR algorithm for lateral motion control based on Genetic Algorithm (GA) parameter optimisation and PID steering angle compensation. Firstly, based on the vehicle dynamics tracking error model, the intelligent vehicle LQR lateral motion controller as well as the feedforward controller are designed, and upon which the predictive controller is added to eliminate the system lag.Subsequently, exploiting the advantage that the PID algorithm is not model-based, a PID steering angle compensation controller that can directly control and correct the lateral error is designed. Second, a LQR controller based on path tracking deviation is designed by using the parameter rectification method of genetic algorithm (GA), which optimizes the control parameters of the lateral motion controller and improves the adaptivity of the control accuracy. Finally, Based on the Carsim-Simulink co-simulation platform, the simulation validation and analysis of double lane change (DLC) test and circular condition test (CCT) are carried out, and the results indicate that compared with the other two LQR controllers, the optimised controllers improved more than 50% in lateral error and heading error control, and the vehicle sideslip angle and vehicle yaw rate are in the range of -0.05° to 0.05° and - 0.15 rad/s to 0.10 rad/s, and it showed improved performance in tracking accuracy and satisfied vehicle stability constrains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.