Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333262›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Effect of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of patients with septic shock: a retrospective cohort study.

Jun Xu, Jian Chen, Hongliu Cai, Xia Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Efficacy of Non-invasive Ventilation Compared with Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Jian ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Hongliu CaiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Xia ZhengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China. zxicu@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based data regarding the timing of the application of invasive mechanical ventilation among adults with septic shock is insufficient. The guidelines fail to provide clear advice about the optimal time to initiate this support. Consequently, we aimed to investigate whether early intubation could improve survival rates in septic shock patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database to evaluate the effectiveness of early intubation on mortality in a cohort of septic shock patients. Adults diagnosed with septic shock, according to the Sepsis-3 definition, were included. They were categorized into an early intubation group (first 8 h after vasopressor initiation) and a non-early intubation group (unexposed). A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality rates. In addition, we employed the restricted cubic spline to analyze the potential non-linear relationship between the timing of intubation and 30-day or 90-day all-cause mortality. A total of 6864 adult patients, of whom 2048 were intubated in the first 8 h, were evaluated in the final cohort. Following a 1:1 PSM procedure, 2786 patients were successfully paired. At 30 days, 288 of 1393 patients (20.7%) in the early intubation group and 381 of 1393 patients (27.4%) in the non-early intubation group had died (hazard ratio [HR] 0.717; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.616-0.836; p < 0.001). Similarly, the results also showed that early intubation was associated with a lower 90 day all-cause mortality rate (HR 0.761; 95% CI 0.663-0.874; p < 0.001). Furthermore, ICU and hospital lengths of stay were significantly different between the groups (3.6 [1.9, 7.1] vs. 2.3 [1.3, 4.3]; p < 0.001 and 8.9 [5.4, 15.1] vs. 7.2 [4.5, 12.0]; p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, we further confirmed the robustness of our findings. Additionally, we found that the timing of intubation is inversely U-shaped correlated to the 30 day all-cause mortality rate. Among adult patients with septic shock, the early initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation could improve clinical outcomes. The timing of intubation demonstrated an inverse U-shaped association with the 30 day all-cause mortality rate, with the peak risk of death occurring at 50.5 h after septic shock.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealRespiration, ArtificialShock, SepticAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeClinical outcomesMIMIC IVPropensity score-matchedSeptic shockTiming of intubation

Identifiers

PMID39333262
PMCPMC11436761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.