ArticleScientific reports2024
Effect of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of patients with septic shock: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics, Practice Patterns, and Outcomes of Emergency Department Intubation for Sepsis: An ANZEDAR Registry Study.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Non-invasive Ventilation Compared with Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Endotracheal Intubation Timing on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Severe Pneumonia: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- The Impact of Age on In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Sepsis: Findings from a Nationwide Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Using machine learning techniques for early prediction of tracheal intubation in patients with septic shock: a multi-center study in South Korea.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- Drivers of prognosis and clinical trajectories differ between COVID and non-COVID acute hypoxic respiratory failure.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence-based data regarding the timing of the application of invasive mechanical ventilation among adults with septic shock is insufficient. The guidelines fail to provide clear advice about the optimal time to initiate this support. Consequently, we aimed to investigate whether early intubation could improve survival rates in septic shock patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database to evaluate the effectiveness of early intubation on mortality in a cohort of septic shock patients. Adults diagnosed with septic shock, according to the Sepsis-3 definition, were included. They were categorized into an early intubation group (first 8 h after vasopressor initiation) and a non-early intubation group (unexposed). A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality rates. In addition, we employed the restricted cubic spline to analyze the potential non-linear relationship between the timing of intubation and 30-day or 90-day all-cause mortality. A total of 6864 adult patients, of whom 2048 were intubated in the first 8 h, were evaluated in the final cohort. Following a 1:1 PSM procedure, 2786 patients were successfully paired. At 30 days, 288 of 1393 patients (20.7%) in the early intubation group and 381 of 1393 patients (27.4%) in the non-early intubation group had died (hazard ratio [HR] 0.717; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.616-0.836; p < 0.001). Similarly, the results also showed that early intubation was associated with a lower 90 day all-cause mortality rate (HR 0.761; 95% CI 0.663-0.874; p < 0.001). Furthermore, ICU and hospital lengths of stay were significantly different between the groups (3.6 [1.9, 7.1] vs. 2.3 [1.3, 4.3]; p < 0.001 and 8.9 [5.4, 15.1] vs. 7.2 [4.5, 12.0]; p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, we further confirmed the robustness of our findings. Additionally, we found that the timing of intubation is inversely U-shaped correlated to the 30 day all-cause mortality rate. Among adult patients with septic shock, the early initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation could improve clinical outcomes. The timing of intubation demonstrated an inverse U-shaped association with the 30 day all-cause mortality rate, with the peak risk of death occurring at 50.5 h after septic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.