ArticleScientific reports2024
Identifying defects and varieties of Malting Barley Kernels.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating performance and key factors for real-world deployment of grain image classification using convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Non-Destructive Monitoring of External Quality of Date Palm Fruit (Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces a comprehensive approach for classifying individual malting barley kernels, involving dual-sided kernel imaging, a specifically designed image processing algorithm, an optimized deep neural network architecture, and a mechanical sorting system. The proposed method achieves precise classification into multiple classes, aligning with quality standards for malting material assessment. Throughout the study, various image analysis techniques were assessed, including traditional feature engineering, established transfer learning deep neural network architectures, and our custom-designed convolutional neural network tailored for barley kernel image analysis. Comparative analysis underscores the superior performance of our network model. The study reveals that our proposed deep learning network achieves a 94% accuracy in classifying barley kernel defects and varieties, outperforming well-established transfer learning models to complex architectures that attain 93% accuracy. Additionally, it surpasses the traditional machine learning approach involving feature extraction and support vector machine classifiers, which achieve accuracy below 90% in detecting defective kernels and below 70% in varietal classification. However, we also noted the traditional approach's advantage in morphological feature recognition. This observation guides new research toward integrating morphological feature extraction techniques with modern convolutional networks. This paper presents a deep neural network designed specifically for the analysis of cereal kernel images in two applications: defect and variety classification. It emphasizes the importance of standardizing kernel orientation and merging images from both sides of the kernel, and introduces a device for image acquisition that fulfills this need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.