ArticleScientific reports2024
The impact of the tumor microenvironment on the survival of penile cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The prognostic role of HPV status in penile squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2025Pooled it
- B7-H3 (CD276) as Target for T Cell-Based Bispecific Antibody Therapy of Penile Cancer.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
- Identification of prognostic genes associated with mitochondria and macrophage polarization in prostate adenocarcinoma based on transcriptome and Mendelian randomization analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Inflammation in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PeCa is a rare entity with rising incidence rates due to increased infections with human papillomaviruses (HPV). The distinct subtypes of PeCa with an individual pathogenesis demand biomarkers for a precise patient risk assessment regarding disease progression and therapeutic susceptibility. We recently identified promising candidates associated with an HPV-instructed tumor microenvironment (TME) using HPV-positive PeCa cell lines and tissue microarrays (TMA). The capacity of HPV + p63 + PeCa cells to release neutrophil-attracting CXCL-8 provided a molecular link explaining the infiltration of CD15 + myeloid cells in PeCa specimens. The candidate biomarkers HPV, p63, CD15, DKK1, and CD147 linked a tumor-promoting TME with a higher TNM classification reflecting more aggressive and metastasizing cancers. Based on immune-reactive scores (IRS) from TMA staining for these biomarkers, we calculated correlations and conducted association analyses to assess the degree of relationship between all biomarkers. We then conducted Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox regression analyses to delineate the impact on PeCa patient survival. There is a notable predictive potential regarding the survival of patients with biomarker profiles beyond the potency of the individual biomarker. From all candidate biomarkers and biomarker profiles, the combination of CD147 and infiltrating CD15 + cells linked to an active HPV-driven transformation displayed cancer-immune dynamics with dismal prognosis for patients. After deciphering relevant interdependencies, the HPV + CD147 + CD15 + status was the most potent profile predicting metastasis-free survival of PeCa patients. The results of this report underscore the need for analysis of the TME and the development of multi-parameter composite scores that reflect fundamental cancer-immune relationships to tailor therapeutic interventions based on actual cancer immune dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.