SynthesisScientific reports2024
Antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial watch: antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy.Oncoimmunology · 2026Review
- Review
- Immunotherapy for Cancer: Current Advances and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Natural Products as Modulators of the DNA Damage Response and Oncogenic Signaling in Breast Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Clinical translation and landscape of stimuli-responsive nanomedicines and microscale therapeutics.Chemical Society reviews · 2026Review
- Precision theranostics in oncology: integrating antibody-drug conjugates, radioimmunotherapy, and immuno‑PET for adaptive cancer care.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Current GMP standards for the large-scale production of monoclonal antibodies.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Oncology: Principles, Clinical Development, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
- Overcoming resistance to antibody-drug conjugates: mechanisms and emerging strategies.The oncologist · 2026Review
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: Therapeutic-Window Engineering, Tumor Heterogeneity, and Immunotherapy Combinations.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of resistance to trastuzumab deruxtecan in breast cancer elucidated by multi-omic molecular profiling.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Preclinical Evaluation of DB-1419, a Novel Bifunctional and Bispecific Anti-B7-H3 × PD-L1 Antibody-Drug Conjugate.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Article
- Reprogramming the tumor microenvironment: synergistic mechanisms of antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors.Antibody therapeutics · 2025Review
- LGALS3BP antibody-drug conjugate enhances tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and synergizes with immunotherapy to restrain neuroblastoma growth.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer treatment: resistance mechanisms and the role of therapeutic sequencing.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone fosters hope for the treatment of cancer, the effect of single drug treatment is limited and the safety profile of ADC and ICI therapy remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of the combination of ADC and ICI therapy. This study type is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Literature retrieval was carried out through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane from inception to Jun. 5, 2024. Then, after data extraction, overall response rate (ORR) and adverse effects (AEs) were used to study its efficiency and safety. Publication bias was also calculated through Funnel plot, Begg's Test and Egger's test. Heterogeneity was investigated through subgroup and sensitivity analysis. The research protocol was registered with the PROSPERO (CRD42023375601). A total of 12 eligible clinical studies with 584 patients were included. The pooled ORR was 58% (95%CI 46%, 70%). Subgroup analysis showed an ORR of 77% (95%CI 63%, 91%) in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and an ORR of 73% (95%CI 56%, 90%) in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The most common AEs was peripheral neuropathy (38.0%). Meanwhile, AEs on skin (13.1-20.0%) and digestive system (9.0-36.0%) was hard be overlooked. ADC + ICI therapy may be recommended in cancer treatment, especially in cHL and NHL. However, strategies to manage toxicities warranted further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.