ArticleScientific reports2024
Identifying and characterizing disease subpopulations that most benefit from polygenic risk scores.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inclusion bias affects common variant discovery and replication in a health-system linked biobank.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Improving neuroblastoma risk prediction through a polygenic risk score derived from genome-wide association study-identified loci.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) hold promise in their potential translation into clinical settings to improve disease risk prediction. An important consideration in integrating PRSs into clinical settings is to gain an understanding of how to identify which subpopulations of individuals most benefit from PRSs for risk prediction. In this study, using the UK Biobank dataset, we trained logistic regression models to predict the 10 year incident risk of myocardial infarction, breast cancer, and schizophrenia using either just clinical features or clinical features combined with PRSs. For each disease, we identified the top 10% subgroup with the greatest magnitude of improvement in risk prediction accuracy attributed to PRSs in the multi-modal model. Using up to ~ 3.6 k demographic, lifestyle, diagnostic, lab, and physical measurement features from the UK Biobank dataset of ~ 500 k individuals, we characterized these subgroups based on various clinical, lifestyle, and demographic characteristics. The incident cases in the top 10% subgroup for each disease represent distinct phenotypes that differ from other cases and that are strongly correlated with genetic predisposition. Our findings provide insights into disease subtypes and can encourage future studies aimed at classifying these individuals to enhance the targeting of polygenic risk scoring in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.