Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333190›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Identifying and characterizing disease subpopulations that most benefit from polygenic risk scores.

Monica Isgut, Felipe Giuste, Logan Gloster, Aniketh Swain, Katherine Choi, Andrew Hornback, Shriprasad R Deshpande, May D Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Monica IsgutDepartment of Bioinformatics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Felipe GiusteSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Logan GlosterDepartment of Bioinformatics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Aniketh SwainSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Katherine ChoiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Andrew HornbackSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. ahornback6@gatech.edu.
Shriprasad R DeshpandeAdvanced Cardiac Therapies and Heart Transplant Program, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, 20010, USA.
May D WangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. maywang@gatech.edu.

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM142617 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Jason Yustein · 2022 to 2026
$7.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM142617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) hold promise in their potential translation into clinical settings to improve disease risk prediction. An important consideration in integrating PRSs into clinical settings is to gain an understanding of how to identify which subpopulations of individuals most benefit from PRSs for risk prediction. In this study, using the UK Biobank dataset, we trained logistic regression models to predict the 10 year incident risk of myocardial infarction, breast cancer, and schizophrenia using either just clinical features or clinical features combined with PRSs. For each disease, we identified the top 10% subgroup with the greatest magnitude of improvement in risk prediction accuracy attributed to PRSs in the multi-modal model. Using up to ~ 3.6 k demographic, lifestyle, diagnostic, lab, and physical measurement features from the UK Biobank dataset of ~ 500 k individuals, we characterized these subgroups based on various clinical, lifestyle, and demographic characteristics. The incident cases in the top 10% subgroup for each disease represent distinct phenotypes that differ from other cases and that are strongly correlated with genetic predisposition. Our findings provide insights into disease subtypes and can encourage future studies aimed at classifying these individuals to enhance the targeting of polygenic risk scoring in practice.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMultifactorial InheritanceAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Risk ScoreGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID39333190
PMCPMC11436906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.