ArticleScientific reports2024
Routine whole spine magnetic resonance imaging for patients with anorectal malformations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiological analysis of congenital spinal deformities in patients associated with anorectal malformations: a cross-sectional study of 86 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of three fecal continence scoring systems in anorectal malformations: inter-score agreement and prognostic factors.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the necessity of performing whole spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as opposed to solely lumbosacral MRI for detecting high-level spinal lesions (in the brain, cervical, or thoracic spine) in patients with anorectal malformations (ARM). This retrospective cohort study included 69 patients treated for ARM at a medical center between January 2011 and January 2022. Before March 2021, lumbosacral MRI was used for patients with ARM. Since March 2021, anomalies in the posterior cranial fossa and whole spine were assessed using routine MRI. Both male (n = 30, 43.4%) and female patients were included in the study. Out of the 69 patients, 19 (27.5%) underwent whole spine MRI, and 50 (72.5%) underwent lumbosacral MRI. In the whole spine group, 4 patients had anomalies beyond the lumbosacral area. In the lumbosacral group, 4 patients subsequently underwent whole spine MRI due to symptoms, with 3 revealing higher-level anomalies.High-level spinal and brain anomalies, although infrequent, are present in patients with ARM. The findings suggest considering routine whole spine MRI in screening ARM patients to avoid missing high-level anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.