ArticleNature communications2024
Deep learning prediction of electrospray ionization tandem mass spectra of chemically derived molecules.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced Environmental PFAS Characterization Using a Virtual High-Resolution Mass Spectral Library Generated by Transfer Learning-Based Neural Network.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- A multiplatform chromatography-mass spectrometry dataset for targeted and suspect screening of pollutants.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Automated annotation of complex natural products using a modular fragmentation-based structure assembly (MFSA) strategy.Science advances · 2025Article
- Graph-sequence enhanced transformer for template-free prediction of natural product biosynthesis.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- DerivaPredict: A User-Friendly Tool for Predicting and Evaluating Active Derivatives of Natural Products.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning prediction of electrospray ionization tandem mass spectra of chemically derived molecules.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemical derivatization is a powerful strategy to enhance sensitivity and selectivity of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for non-targeted analysis of chemicals in complex mixtures. However, it remains impossible to obtain large sets of reference spectra for chemically derived molecules (CDMs), representing a major barrier in real-world applications. Herein, we describe a deep learning approach that enables accurate prediction of electrospray ionization tandem mass spectra for CDMs (DeepCDM). DeepCDM is established by transfer learning from a generic spectrum predicting model using a small set of experimentally acquired tandem mass spectra of CDMs, which converts a generic model with low predictability for CDMs into a specialized model with high predictability. We demonstrate DeepCDM by predicting electrospray ionization tandem mass spectra of dansylated molecules. The success in establishing Dns-MS further enables the development of DnsBank, a dansylation-specialized in silico spectral library. DnsBank achieves significant increases of accurate annotation rates of dansylated molecules, facilitating discovery of new hazardous pollutants from an environmental study of leather industrial wastewater. DeepCDM is also highly versatile for other classes of CDMs. Therefore, we envision that DeepCDM will pave a way for high-throughput identification of CDMs in non-targeted analysis to dig unknowns with potential health impacts from emerging anthropogenic chemicals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.