ArticleScientific reports2024
Clinical characteristics and long-term treatment outcomes of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with classic type leakage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Faricimab for treatment-naïve nAMD: 1- and 2-year outcomes and PS-OCT polarimetric entropy.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate long-term treatment outcomes of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) with classic type leakage and to compare the outcomes with those of PCV without classic type leakage. This retrospective study included 153 patients diagnosed with PCV and treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Patients showing classic type leakage on fluorescein angiography were included in the classic type leakage group (N = 40, 26.1%), and those without classic type leakage were included in the occult group (N = 113, 73.9%). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline and 24 months, changes in BCVA, incidence of fibrosis, and lesion reactivation after initial loading injections were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the baseline BCVA between the classic type leakage group (mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution 0.67 ± 0.53[Snellen equivalents = 20/93]) and the occult group (0.55 ± 0.49[20/70])(P = 0.639). In addition, the BCVA at 24 months (0.44 ± 0.53[20/55] vs. 0.38 ± 0.41[20/47])(P = 1.000), changes in BCVA (0.22 ± 0.42 improvement[2.2 lines] vs. 0.16 ± 0.36 improvement[1.6 lines]) (P = 0.366), and lesion reactivation (P = 0.787) did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of fibrosis was higher in the classic type leakage group (37.5%) than in the occult group (14.2%) (P = 0.002). Although the incidence of fibrosis was higher in PCVs with classic type leakage, the overall treatments were not significantly different between PCVs with and without classic type leakage. In addition, substantial visual improvement was noted at 24 months, suggesting that PCVs with classic type leakage can be effectively treated with anti-VEGF therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.