ArticleScientific reports2024
A novel computational signal processing framework towards multimodal vital signs extraction using neck-worn wearable devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory Monitoring in Motion: An Overview of Wearable Methods and Algorithmic Approaches for Reliable Assessment.Biosensors · 2026Review
- POF cardiorespiratory sensor combined with a thermal imaging temperature sensor for multimodal emotion recognition.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Feasibility of heart rate monitoring in hemodialysis patients using visible imaging: a pilot study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulse rate (PR) and respiratory rate (RR) are two of the most important vital signs. Monitoring them would benefit from easy-to-use technologies. Hence, wearable devices would, in principle, be ideal candidates for such systems. The neck, although highly susceptible to artifacts, presents an attractive location for a diverse pool of physiological biomarkers monitoring purposes such as airflow sensing in a non-obstructive manner. This paper presents a methodology for PR and RR estimation using photoplethysmography (PPG) and accelerometry (Acc) sensors placed on the neck. Neck PPG and Acc signals were recorded from 22 healthy participants for RR estimation, where the resting subjects performed guided breathing following a visual metronome. Neck PPG signals were obtained from 16 healthy participants who breathed through an altitude generator machine in order to acquire a wider range of PR readings while at rest. The proposed methodology was able to provide rate estimates via a combination of recursive FFT-based dominance scoring coupled with an exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA)-driven aggregation scheme. The recursion aimed at bypassing sudden intra-window amplitude deviations caused by momentary artifacts, while the EWMA-based aggregation was utilized for handling inter-window artifact-induced deviations. To further improve estimation stability and confidence, estimates were calculated in the form of rate bands taking into account the relevant clinically acceptable error margins, and results when considering rate values and rate bands are presented and discussed. The framework was able to achieve an overall pulse rate value accuracy of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.