Observational studyScientific reports2024
Satisfaction of patients with frozen shoulder following silent manipulation: a prospective observation study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced manipulation technique for ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block to improve shoulder external rotation in frozen shoulder: a retrospective study.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silent manipulation is a procedure for frozen shoulders that involves manipulating the shoulder while the patient is awake by performing C5, C6, and C7 cervical nerve root block under ultrasound guidance. This retrospective study, conducted at Yokohama City University Hospital, aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of silent manipulation and assess whether the experience level of the practitioner influenced treatment efficacy. Between October 2020 and January 2022, 53 patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent silent manipulation for frozen shoulder. The procedure was performed by either an experienced or a less experienced practitioner, and the patients were followed-up for up to 1 year post-treatment. Silent manipulation resulted in significant improvements in shoulder range of motion, as measured by forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and hand-behind-back, as well as in patient-reported outcomes, including disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand and Shoulder 36 scores. These improvements were observed 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year after silent manipulation, indicating the short-term efficacy of the procedure. Furthermore, this study revealed that the practitioners' level of experience played a significant role in the outcomes. The experienced doctor achieved better 1st external rotation and belt tying outcomes, as well as Shoulder 36 pain, muscle strength, and activities of daily living domain scores. This suggests that technical expertise in silent manipulation is crucial to achieve optimal outcomes. Silent manipulation offers an effective therapeutic approach for frozen shoulder, leading to significant improvements in range of motion and patient satisfaction. Practitioner expertise is a vital factor in treatment success, emphasizing the importance of skilled professionals in the performance of this procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.