ArticleScientific data2024
Temporal dynamics in psychological assessments: a novel dataset with scales and response times.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auditable cross-instrument detection of unusual multivariate psychiatric response configurations using a semantically aligned covariance subspace.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Response-time process signals for selective escalation in reduced-item mental health symptom screening.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Impact of Individual Factors on Careless Responding Across Different Mental Disorder Screenings: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Psychiatry in the age of AI: transforming theory, practice, and medical education.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Variability and stability of autistic traits in the general population: A systematic comparison between online and in-lab samples.Personality neuroscience · 2025Article
- Temporal dynamics in psychological assessments: a novel dataset with scales and response times.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing prevalence of mental health issues underscores the need for innovative screening methods. Large-scale, internet-based psychological screening has emerged as a vital tool to accurately determine morbidity rates and facilitate early diagnosis of mental disorders. However, conventional psychological screening methods often struggle with non-genuine responses and lack objective metrics. To bridge this gap, we have compiled a novel dataset derived from an expansive screening initiative at Xinxiang Medical University. The study, conducted from February 27 to March 17, 2021, yielded a dataset comprising responses from 24,292 students to four well-established psychological scales-PHQ-9, GAD-7, ISI, and PSS. A distinctive feature of this dataset is the inclusion of response time data, which captures the temporal dynamics of participants' interactions with the scales, offering valuable insights into their response behaviour. The release of this dataset offers a substantial opportunity for researchers in the domains of psychology and public health to explore new insights into mental health, scale reliability, and the dynamics of psychological assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.