Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333020›Full record

ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2025

Care pathways for reduced fetal movements: A cost-consequence analysis.

Matthew J Mcknoulty, Elizabeth K Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew J McknoultyMetro North Health, Queensland Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1957-2271
Elizabeth K MartinMater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0252-8303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the costs and consequences of a new midwife-navigator-facilitated care pathway for reduced fetal movements. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study was conducted at a tertiary obstetric centre in Queensland, Australia and modelling occurred for this and smaller services. Two months of data from pre (n = 112 in 2019) and post (n = 141 in 2020) implementation of the care pathway were analysed with T-tests and logistic regression models to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes. A Markov model was built to estimate the costs and consequences of the intervention. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to test various scenarios including modelling for smaller centres.

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcome between the intervention and usual care groups. Intervention patients spent one hour and eight minutes less time in hospital (P < 0.001). This resulted in a saving to the centre of AU$135 per patient (AU$159 083 annually). One-way sensitivity analysis suggested that cost savings would be found in all scenarios except for smaller units providing services for less than 1900 births per annum. CONCLUSION(S): To our knowledge, no other care pathway involving acute obstetric care has been economically evaluated to date. Our model based on real-world presentations for reduced fetal movements confirms that midwife-navigators may be an economically beneficial implementation strategy for dealing with common obstetric conditions.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysFetal MovementMidwiferyPrenatal CareAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMarkov ChainsPregnancyQueenslandcosts and costs analysishealth services researchmidwiferyobstetricsstillbirth

Identifiers

PMID39333020
PMCPMC12099183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.