ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2025
Care pathways for reduced fetal movements: A cost-consequence analysis.
Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the costs and consequences of a new midwife-navigator-facilitated care pathway for reduced fetal movements. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted at a tertiary obstetric centre in Queensland, Australia and modelling occurred for this and smaller services. Two months of data from pre (n = 112 in 2019) and post (n = 141 in 2020) implementation of the care pathway were analysed with T-tests and logistic regression models to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes. A Markov model was built to estimate the costs and consequences of the intervention. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to test various scenarios including modelling for smaller centres.
resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcome between the intervention and usual care groups. Intervention patients spent one hour and eight minutes less time in hospital (P < 0.001). This resulted in a saving to the centre of AU$135 per patient (AU$159 083 annually). One-way sensitivity analysis suggested that cost savings would be found in all scenarios except for smaller units providing services for less than 1900 births per annum. CONCLUSION(S): To our knowledge, no other care pathway involving acute obstetric care has been economically evaluated to date. Our model based on real-world presentations for reduced fetal movements confirms that midwife-navigators may be an economically beneficial implementation strategy for dealing with common obstetric conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.