Trial reportNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2025
Intravenous methylprednisolone for nephrotic syndrome with minimal change lesions in adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) usually experience severe oedema, which can affect the absorption of oral corticosteroid during the first 2 weeks. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the efficacy of intravenous (IV) isovalent methylprednisolone induction followed by oral prednisone therapy with conventional oral prednisone therapy in highly oedematous MCNS patients, aiming to provide a better therapy for MCNS patients.
methodsA single-centre, open-label, parallel-arm RCT was performed in the Nephrology Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in our study from May 2015 to October 2020 and were randomized to receive conventional oral steroid or 2 weeks of IV methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone.
resultsA total of 117 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the sequential group (n = 57) or the oral group (n = 60). The total remission rate in the sequential group was higher than in the oral group after treatment for 2 weeks and 4 weeks (P = .032, P = .027). The complete remission (CR) rate was higher in the sequential group than in the oral group (63.3% versus 41.5%; P = .031) after treatment for 2 weeks. The time to achieve CR was shorter in the sequential group than in the oral group, with a statistically significant difference {14.0 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.5-14.5] versus 16.0 days [95% CI 12.7-19.3], P = .024}. There were no significant differences in relapse rate (24.5% versus 28.3%; P = .823) and time to relapse (155 ± 103 days versus 150.7 ± 103.7 days; P = .916) between two groups.
conclusionThis study suggested that highly oedematous MCNS patients who received IV isovalent methylprednisolone induction therapy followed by oral prednisone achieved earlier remission than the conventional oral prednisone regimen without differences in relapse rates or adverse effects. Short-term IV methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone may be a better choice for MCNS patients with severe oedema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.