Trial reportThe British journal of ophthalmology2025
Interaction of retinal electrophysiology and novel orthokeratology lens use on myopia control efficacy in children.
Trial report in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of orthokeratology in controlling myopia in adolescents aged 6-18 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Compliance with orthokeratology lens wear: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Short-Term Effects of Optically Induced and Digitally Simulated Myopic Blur on Retinal Perfusion: Insights From Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Orthokeratology and retinal risk: a new dimension in myopia control.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe relationship between retinal electrophysiological function and myopia progression was evaluated in school-aged children wearing Breath-O-Correct Orthokeratology (OK) lenses compared with those wearing single vision (SV) lenses over 24 months.
methodsIn this randomised, single-blind, parallel controlled trial, children aged 8-12 years with -1.00 to -4.00 D of myopia were recruited. Retinal function was evaluated using global-flash multifocal electroretinography at baseline before OK or SV treatment. Axial length was evaluated at 6-month intervals up to 24 months. The main outcome measures were axial elongation (AE) between groups and the interactive effect of baseline retinal function.
resultsA total of 70 children (43 OK, 9.8±1.3 years; 27 SV, 9.5±1.4 years) completed the 2-year study and were included in the analysis. The 2-year normalised AE was 0.37±0.37 mm in the OK group and 0.60±0.41 mm in the SV group, respectively. For children in the SV group, the amplitude of the central inner retinal response was negatively correlated with axial length elongation (p=0.03). In contrast, this relationship between retinal electrophysiology and AE was not observed in OK group, indicating that they were independent of each other in children treated with OK (p=0.33).
conclusionA weak retinal electrophysiological response was a risk factor for rapid AE in SV controls. However, OK treatment can lower this risk factor and significantly reduce AE in school-aged children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.