Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39332809›Full record

ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2024

A Peer Support Intervention in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): The STEPP Proof-of-Concept Trial.

Hermioni L Amonoo, Michelle Guo, Emma P Keane, Annabella C Boardman, M Tim Song, Emma D Wolfe, Corey Cutler, Heather S Jim, Stephanie J Lee, Jeff C Huffman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The experience of fertility preservation decision-making in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hermioni L AmonooDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: hermioni_amonoo@dfci.harvard.edu.
Michelle GuoDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Emma P KeaneDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Annabella C BoardmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
M Tim SongDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Emma D WolfeDepartment of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.
Corey CutlerHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Heather S JimDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Stephanie J LeeClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Jeff C HuffmanHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Areej El-JawahriHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Mass General Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

A Positive Psychology Intervention for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Patients.K08CA251654 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI AMONOO, HERMIONI L. · 2020 to 2024
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA251654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although peer support interventions are associated with improved patient-reported outcomes in diverse cancer populations, structured peer support programs tailored to the needs of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are lacking. This single-arm, proof-of-concept trial aimed to refine the Supporting Transplant Experiences with Peer Program (STEPP), a structured, five-session, manualized, phone-delivered peer support intervention for patients undergoing HSCT, informed by qualitative feedback from patients. Adult patients with hematologic malignancies scheduled to undergo allogeneic or autologous HSCT were eligible to participate in the study approximately two weeks prior to their HSCT hospitalization. Participants received the STEPP intervention, which focused on providing informational, emotional, and practical support. To refine the intervention, we conducted semi-structured qualitative exit interviews to gather feedback on the content of STEPP and to identify facilitators and barriers to engagement. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using rapid analytic methods by two coders. Of the 37 eligible patients, 25 enrolled in the study, 20 completed all intervention sessions and 20 completed exit interviews. Participants highlighted that discussions with peer mentors/STEPP interventionists about the transplant journey and processing information provided by the clinical team were the most valuable aspects of STEPP. Positive experiences during the first intervention session facilitated patient engagement with the program. Potential barriers to engagement included logistical challenges in connecting with interventionists while experiencing physical symptoms during inpatient hospitalization and being paired with an interventionist who had a different cancer diagnosis and/or type of transplant. Patients undergoing HSCT reported positive experiences with the structured five-session, phone-delivered peer support intervention administered before and during the HSCT hospitalization. Patients' descriptions of barriers and facilitators to engagement with the STEPP intervention underscore the importance of patient input and programmatic structure in peer support interventions for this population. Insights from this proof-of-concept trial will be incorporated into future trials of STEPP to improve outcomes in HSCT recipients.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPeer GroupAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProof of Concept StudySocial SupportCancerHematologic malignancyHematopoietic stem cell transplantationPeer mentorPeer supportQuality of lifeRecoverySocial supportStem cell transplantation

Identifiers

PMID39332809
PMCPMC11620926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.