ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2024
A Comparative Genomic Study of Conventional and Undifferentiated Melanoma.
Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Undifferentiated melanoma, defined as melanoma that has lost all usual phenotypic and immunohistochemical characteristics of conventional melanoma, can pose significant diagnostic challenges. Molecular studies have advanced our understanding of undifferentiated melanoma by demonstrating that a subset of these tumors harbors known melanoma driver alterations in genes such as BRAF, NRAS, and NF1. However, there is a paucity of data describing genetic alterations that may distinguish undifferentiated melanoma from conventional melanoma. In this study, we directly compared the genomic profiles of undifferentiated melanoma to a cohort of conventional melanomas, including 14 undifferentiated melanoma cases (comprised of 2 primary cases, 2 cutaneous recurrences, and 10 metastases) and a cohort of 127 conventional melanomas including primary, recurrent, and metastatic cases. Targeted sequencing of 447 cancer-associated genes was performed, including identification of mutations and copy number alterations. NRAS was the most frequent melanoma driver in undifferentiated melanoma (8/14 cases, 57%), although notably, only 1 undifferentiated melanoma harbored an NRAS Q61R mutation. Compared with the conventional melanoma cohort, undifferentiated melanoma demonstrated statistically significant enrichment of pathogenic activating RAC1 mutations (6/14 total cases, 43%), including P29S (4/6 cases), P29L (1/6 cases), and D11E (1/6 cases). In addition to providing insight into the molecular pathogenesis of undifferentiated melanoma, these findings also suggest that RAS Q61R immunohistochemistry may have limited utility for its diagnosis. The presence of recurrent RAC1 mutations in undifferentiated melanoma is also notable as these alterations may contribute to mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway-targeted therapy resistance. Furthermore, the RAC1 alterations identified in this cohort have been shown to drive a melanocytic to mesenchymal switch in melanocytes, offering a possible explanation for the undifferentiated phenotype of these melanomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.