ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2024
Common variants increase risk for congenital diaphragmatic hernia within the context of de novo variants.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Epigenetics Bridges Genes and Environment: A Multiomics Evidence Chain in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.Birth defects research · 2026Review
- Mechanical compression causes lung hypoplasia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia with GATA4 genetic variants.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2026Article
- The inactive X chromosome as a female protector in autism and beyond.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Profiling circular RNAs in amniotic fluid and fetal lungs from congenital diaphragmatic hernia cases: insights into potential prognostic and diagnostic applications.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- LONP1 Variants Are Associated With Clinically Diverse Phenotypes.Clinical genetics · 2026Article
- Modeling patient variants ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- The inactive X chromosome as a female protector in autism and beyond.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
51 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a severe congenital anomaly often accompanied by other structural anomalies and/or neurobehavioral manifestations. Rare de novo protein-coding variants and copy-number variations contribute to CDH in the population. However, most individuals with CDH remain genetically undiagnosed. Here, we perform integrated de novo and common-variant analyses using 1,469 CDH individuals, including 1,064 child-parent trios and 6,133 ancestry-matched, unaffected controls for the genome-wide association study. We identify candidate CDH variants in 15 genes, including eight novel genes, through deleterious de novo variants. We further identify two genomic loci contributing to CDH risk through common variants with similar effect sizes among Europeans and Latinx. Both loci are in putative transcriptional regulatory regions of developmental patterning genes. Estimated heritability in common variants is ∼19%. Strikingly, there is no significant difference in estimated polygenic risk scores between isolated and complex CDH or between individuals harboring deleterious de novo variants and individuals without these variants. The data support a polygenic model as part of the CDH genetic architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.