Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39331624›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Domain affiliated distilled knowledge transfer for improved convergence of Ph-negative MPN identifier.

Md Tanzim Reza, Md Golam Rabiul Alam, Rafeed Rahman, Shakib Mahmud Dipto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Md Tanzim RezaBRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-8964-1565
Md Golam Rabiul AlamBRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Rafeed RahmanBRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shakib Mahmud DiptoUniversity of Liberal Arts Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ph-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasm is a rare yet dangerous disease that can turn into more severe forms of disorders later on. Clinical diagnosis of the disease exists but often requires collecting multiple types of pathologies which can be tedious and time-consuming. Meanwhile, studies on deep learning-based research are rare and often need to rely on a small amount of pathological data due to the rarity of the disease. In addition, the existing research works do not address the data scarcity issue apart from using common techniques like data augmentation, which leaves room for performance improvement. To tackle the issue, the proposed research aims to utilize distilled knowledge learned from a larger dataset to boost the performance of a lightweight model trained on a small MPN dataset. Firstly, a 50-layer ResNet model is trained on a large lymph node image dataset of 3,27,680 images, followed by the trained knowledge being distilled to a small 4-layer CNN model. Afterward, the CNN model is initialized with the pre-trained weights to further train on a small MPN dataset of 300 images. Empirical analysis showcases that the CNN with distilled knowledge achieves 97% accuracy compared to 89.67% accuracy achieved by a clone CNN trained from scratch. The distilled knowledge transfer approach also proves to be more effective than more simple data scarcity handling approaches such as augmentation and manual feature extraction. Overall, the research affirms the effectiveness of transferring distilled knowledge to address the data scarcity issue and achieves better convergence when training on a Ph-Negative MPN image dataset with a lightweight model.

Indexed as

Myeloproliferative DisordersDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPhiladelphia Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID39331624
PMCPMC11433141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.