ReviewRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Vessel wall MRI in giant cell arteritis: standardized protocol and scoring approach developed by an international working group.
Review in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Challenges and Modern Therapeutic Strategies in Giant Cell Arteritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 2D-cranial T1-black-blood MRI in suspected giant cell arteritis-measurement of vessel wall thickness does not give a diagnostic advantage compared to visual scoring alone.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- [News on the imaging of large vessel vasculitis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThere are an increasing number of centres performing research on high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (VW-MRI) in GCA. However, harmonized approaches to VW-MRI in GCA are lacking and are essential to performing multicentre studies. Using a data-driven, consensus-based approach, an international expert group developed a standardized MRI protocol and scoring system to advance multi-centred research in cranial GCA.
methodsA targeted literature review of VW-MRI in cranial GCA was conducted. A working group comprised of radiologists, rheumatologists and ophthalmologists with expertise in VW-MRI and GCA reviewed the results of the literature search, presented relevant data and images from their respective centres, and then reached consensus on recommendations related to key MRI structures, MRI sequences, scoring system and other important considerations.
resultsA total of 21 relevant articles were identified and reviewed. Based on published literature, structures to be evaluated on MRI were categorized based on anatomic location (extradural cranial, intradural cranial and orbits) and prioritization (core vs elective). Essential and elective sequences to comprehensively image cranial and orbital structures while minimizing scan time were determined along with scoring systems to grade contrast enhancement.
conclusionThis report describes a standardized approach to facilitate research of VW-MRI in cranial GCA that is the result of a multidisciplinary, international collaboration of experts in VW-MRI and/or GCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.