ArticlePloS one2024
Contrast enhanced longitudinal changes observed in an experimental bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis rat model by radial DCE-MRI at 9.4T.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor visualization and evaluation of glioblastoma in mice using small animal 9.4T MRI and PET‑CT with high resolution.Oncology reports · 2026Article
- Multidimensional lung imaging: integrated preclinical platforms enabling the identification of translational biomarkers for pulmonary research.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- Nanoscale structural alteration of lung collagen in response to strain and bleomycin injury.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Loss of glymphatic homeostasis in heart failure.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying biomarkers in fibrotic lung disease is key for early anti-fibrotic intervention. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI offers valuable perfusion-related insights in fibrosis but adapting human MRI methods to rodents poses challenges. Here, we explored these translational challenges for the inflammatory and fibrotic phase of a bleomycin lung injury model in rats. Eleven male Sprague-Dawley rats received a single intratracheal dose of bleomycin (1000iU), four control rats received saline. Imaging was performed on days 7 and 28 post-induction. Ultra-short echo time imaging was used to image the lung for 7 minutes after which Clariscan was injected intravenously. Lung signal changes were measured for an additional 21 minutes. Images were reconstructed with a sliding-window approach, providing a temporal resolution of 10 seconds per image. After imaging on day 28, animals were euthanized, and lungs were collected for histology. Bleomycin-exposed rats initially exhibited reduced body weight, recovering to control levels after 20 days. Lung volume increased in bleomycin animals from 4.4±0.9 ml in controls to 5.5±0.5 ml and 6.5±1.2 ml on day 7 and 28. DCE-MRI showed no change of initial gradient of relative enhancement in the curves between controls and bleomycin animals on day 7 and 28 post-induction. On day 7, the DCE-MRI washout phase in bleomycin animals had higher signals than the saline group and than observed at a later time point. Lung pixels were binned in 7 enhancement classes. On day 28, the size of low relative enhancement bins almost doubled in volume compared to controls and animals on day 7 post-induction. Histology on day 28 suggests that findings could be explained by changes in lung tissue density due to lung volume increase. Adapting this clinical MRI method to rodents at 9.4T remains a challenge. Future studies may benefit from lower field strength MRI combined with higher temporal resolution DCE-MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.