ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Identifying nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat receptor and pathogen effector pairing using transfer-learning and bilinear attention network.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond R-Genes: Dissecting Metabolic and Nutrient-Driven Wheat Rust Resistance Through Induced Mutagenesis.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- CS-DTA: a language model-driven framework for robust drug-target affinity prediction under strict cold-start scenarios.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
- Recent advances in deep learning for protein-protein interaction: a review.BioData mining · 2025Review
- IRGL-RRI: interpretable graph representation learning for plant RNA-RNA interaction discovery.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- A BERT-based rice enhancer identification model combined with sequence-representation differential entropy interpretation.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Identification of DNA N6-methyladenine modifications in the rice genome with a fine-tuned large language model.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Learning the language of plant immunity: opportunities and challenges for AI-assisted modelling of fungal effector x host protein complexes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- SaGP: identifying plant saline-alkali tolerance genes based on machine learning techniques.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationNucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) family is a class of immune receptors capable of detecting and defending against pathogen invasion. They have been widely used in crop breeding. Notably, the correspondence between NLRs and effectors (CNE) determines the applicability and effectiveness of NLRs. Unfortunately, CNE data is very scarce. In fact, we've found a substantial 91 291 NLRs confirmed via wet experiments and bioinformatics methods but only 387 CNEs are recognized, which greatly restricts the potential application of NLRs.
resultsWe propose a deep learning algorithm called ProNEP to identify NLR-effector pairs in a high-throughput manner. Specifically, we conceptualized the CNE prediction task as a protein-protein interaction (PPI) prediction task. Then, ProNEP predicts the interaction between NLRs and effectors by combining the transfer learning with a bilinear attention network. ProNEP achieves superior performance against state-of-the-art models designed for PPI predictions. Based on ProNEP, we conduct extensive identification of potential CNEs for 91 291 NLRs. With the rapid accumulation of genomic data, we expect that this tool will be widely used to predict CNEs in new species, advancing biology, immunology, and breeding. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The ProNEP is available at http://nerrd.cn/#/prediction. The project code is available at https://github.com/QiaoYJYJ/ProNEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.