ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024
A Method for Treating Significant Conformational Changes in Alchemical Free Energy Simulations of Protein-Ligand Binding.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiple Molecule λ-Dynamics: Probing Drug Resistance with Concurrent Protein and Ligand Perturbations.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- A Thermodynamic Cycle to Predict the Competitive Inhibition Outcomes of an Evolving Enzyme.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Discovery of Novel Pyridin-2-yl Urea Inhibitors Targeting ASK1 Kinase and Its Binding Mode by Absolute Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A thermodynamic cycle to predict the competitive inhibition outcomes of an evolving enzyme.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relative binding free energy (RBFE) simulation is a rigorous approach to the calculation of quantitatively accurate binding free energy values for protein-ligand binding in which a reference binder is gradually converted to a target binder through alchemical transformation during the simulation. The success of such simulations relies on being able to accurately sample the correct conformational phase space for each alchemical state; however, this becomes a challenge when a significant conformation change occurs between the reference and target binder-receptor complexes. Increasing the simulation time and using enhanced sampling methods can be helpful, but effects can be limited, especially when the free energy barrier between conformations is high or when the correct target complex conformation is difficult to find and maintain. Current RBFE protocols seed the reference complex structure into every alchemical window of the simulation. In our study, we describe an improved protocol in which the reference structure is seeded into the first half of the alchemical windows, and the target structure is seeded into the second half of the alchemical windows. By applying information about the relevant correct end point conformations to different simulation windows from the beginning, the need for large barrier crossings or simulation prediction of the correct structures during an alchemical simulation is in many cases obviated. In the diverse cases we examine below, the simulations yielded free energy predictions that are satisfactory as compared to experiment and superior to running the simulations utilizing the conventional protocol. The method is straightforward to implement for publicly available FEP workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.