ArticleJAMA health forum2024
Menopausal Hormone Therapy Use Among Postmenopausal Women.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association of hormone therapy with spheno-orbital meningiomas: bridging evidence and unknowns.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases in Women With Vasomotor Symptoms: A Secondary Analysis of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials.JAMA internal medicine · 2025Trial
- Association of reproductive factors and chronic kidney disease in postmenopausal women: results from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999 - 2020.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Investigating the Relationship Between Estrogen Replacement Therapy and Postoperative Complications Following Single-Level Lumbar Fusion: A Propensity Matched Analysis.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Exogenous Hormone Use and Breslow Thickness in Women With Cutaneous Melanoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- Report of the FDA's expert panel on hormone therapy.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Association Between Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Alzheimer Disease Neuropathology.Neurology · 2026Article
- Reproductive lifespan in relation to diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome in a nationally representative population.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2026Article
- Menopause and neurological disorders: a roadmap for research.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Peri- and Post-Menopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy and Voice Disorder Risk: A TriNetX Study.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Social Media and Supplements for Menopausal Symptoms: A Content Analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Observational
- Prescription Medication Use Among Women Aged 40 and Older in the United States from 1999 to 2020.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2026Article
- The Neurology of Menopause.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Healthcare Acceptability and Delayed Care Among Older People Living with HIV in the All of Us Program.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Article
- Oophorectomy-Corrected Ovarian Cancer Incidence, Survival, and Mortality by Subtype, Race, Ethnicity.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Challenges and knowledge gaps in sex differences in cardio-kidney-metabolic syndrome across the lifespan.Biology of sex differences · 2026Review
- Age at natural menopause and cognitive aging in U.S. women: Educational attainment as a modifiable resilience factor.Maturitas · 2026Article
- The future of HRT/MHT and Alzheimer's disease risk, onset and progression.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Article
- Global, regional, and national burden of chronic respiratory diseases among perimenopausal women, 1990-2021: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the treatment of choice for symptoms of menopause. However, its adoption is hindered by the risk-benefit trade-off in relation to acute and chronic diseases. Objective: To evaluate trends in and correlates of MHT use among postmenopausal women in the US from 1999 to March 2020. Design, Setting, and Participants: This serial cross-sectional analysis of MHT use used data from the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants included noninstitutionalized US postmenopausal women from 10 NHANES study cycles (1999-2000 to 2017-March 2020 [pre-COVID-19 pandemic]). Data were analyzed from December 2023 to April 2024. Exposures: NHANES study cycle. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of MHT use was extracted from the prescription medication data collected during NHANES household interviews. MHT formulations were determined by hormone type. Results: Data on 13 048 US postmenopausal women (47.1% ≥65 years old) were analyzed. From 1999 to 2020, the prevalence of MHT use decreased among women of all age groups, from 26.9% (95% CI, 22.6%-31.7%) in 1999 to 4.7% (95% CI, 3.4%-6.5%) in 2020. Until 2002, MHT use was highest among women aged 52 to 65 years, but since 2005, MHT use has been highest among women younger than 52 years. MHT use decreased by 23.5% (95% CI, 11.4%-35.6%), 31.4% (95% CI, 23.4%-39.5%), and 10.6% (95% CI, 6.3%-14.8%) for women younger than 52 years, 52 years to younger than 65 years, and 65 years and older, respectively. Prevalence of MHT use decreased from 13.8% (95% CI, 8.5%-21.7%) to 2.6% (95% CI, 1.5%-4.6%) for Hispanic women, 11.9% (95% CI, 8.5%-16.3%) to 0.5% (95% CI, 0.2%-1.1%) for non-Hispanic Black women, and 31.4% (95% CI, 27.1%-36.1%) to 5.8% (95% CI, 4.1%-8.2%) for non-Hispanic White women. Non-Hispanic White women consistently had the highest prevalence of MHT use. Estrogen-only formulation accounted for more than 50% of the MHT for most study periods. The prevalence of MHT use varied by family income-to-poverty ratio, health insurance coverage in all racial and ethnic groups, weight, and smoking status among non-Hispanic White women, as well as by education attainment among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cross-sectional study show that over the past 2 decades, MHT use declined among US postmenopausal women of all age and racial and ethnic groups. Women of racial and ethnic minority groups had lower prevalence of MHT use compared to non-Hispanic White women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.