Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39331227›Full record

ReviewEating and weight disorders : EWD2024

Position statement of Italian Society of Obesity (SIO): Gestational Obesity.

Luigi Barrea, Stefania Camastra, Silvia Garelli, Valeria Guglielmi, Melania Manco, Fernanda Velluzzi, Rocco Barazzoni, Ludovica Verde, Giovanna Muscogiuri

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luigi BarreaDipartimento Di Benessere, Nutrizione E Sport, Centro Direzionale, Università Telematica Pegaso, Via Porzio, Isola F2, 80143, Naples, Italy.
Stefania CamastraDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Silvia GarelliDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetes Prevention and Care, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Valeria GuglielmiUnit of Internal Medicine and Obesity Center, Department of Systems Medicine, Policlinico Tor Vergata, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Melania MancoPredictive and Preventive Medicine Research Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Fernanda VelluzziObesity Unit, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Rocco BarazzoniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
Ludovica VerdeUnità di Endocrinologia, Diabetologia e Andrologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Centro Italiano per la cura e il Benessere del Paziente con Obesità (C.I.B.O), Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Giovanna MuscogiuriUnità di Endocrinologia, Diabetologia e Andrologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Centro Italiano per la cura e il Benessere del Paziente con Obesità (C.I.B.O), Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. giovanna.muscogiuri@unina.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGestational obesity (GO) presents a multifaceted challenge to maternal and fetal health, with an escalating prevalence and far-reaching consequences extending beyond pregnancy. This perspective statement by the Italian Society of Obesity (SIO) provides current insights into the diagnosis, maternal and fetal impacts, and treatment strategies for managing this pressing condition.

methodsThis article provides a comprehensive review of the maternal and fetal effects of GO and provides suggestions on strategies for management. Comprehensive review was carried out using the MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases.

resultsThe diagnosis of GO primarily relies on pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), although standardized criteria remain contentious. Anthropometric measures and body composition assessments offer valuable insights into the metabolic implications of GO. Women with GO are predisposed to several health complications, which are attributed to mechanisms such as inflammation and insulin resistance. Offspring of women with GO face heightened risks of perinatal complications and long-term metabolic disorders, indicating intergenerational transmission of obesity-related effects. While nutritional interventions are a cornerstone of management, their efficacy in mitigating complications warrants further investigation. Additionally, while pharmacological interventions have been explored in other contexts, evidence on their safety and efficacy specifically for GO remains lacking, necessitating further investigation.

conclusionGO significantly impacts maternal and fetal health, contributing to both immediate and long-term complications. Effective management requires a multifaceted approach, including precise diagnostic criteria, personalized nutritional interventions, and potential pharmacological treatments. These findings underscore the need for individualized care strategies and further research to optimize outcomes for mothers and their offspring are needed. Enhanced understanding and management of GO can help mitigate its intergenerational effects, improving public health outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V narrative review.

Indexed as

Pregnancy ComplicationsBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansItalyObesityPregnancyPregnancy in ObesitySocieties, MedicalDietGestational diabetes mellitusGestational obesityGestational weight gainNutritionObesityPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39331227
PMCPMC11436444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.