ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Machine learning-based prediction of gastroparesis risk following complete mesocolic excision.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Motility Diagnostics: A Systematic Review.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastroparesis is a major complication following complete mesocolic excision (CME) and significantly impacts patient outcomes. This study aimed to create a machine learning model to pinpoint key risk factors before, during, and after surgery, effectively predicting the risk of gastroparesis after CME.
methodsThe study involved 1146 patients with colon cancer, out of which 95 developed gastroparesis. Data were collected on 34 variables, including demographics, chronic conditions, pre-surgery test results, types of surgery, and intraoperative details. Four machine learning techniques were employed: extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN). The evaluation involved k-fold cross-validation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and external validation.
resultsXGBoost excelled in its performance for predictive models. ROC analysis showed high accuracy for XGBoost, with area under the curve (AUC) scores of 0.976 for the training set and 0.906 for the validation set. K-fold cross-validation confirmed the model's stability, and calibration curves indicated high predictive accuracy. Additionally, DCA highlighted XGBoost's superior patient benefits for intervention treatments. An AUC of 0.77 in external validation demonstrated XGBoost's strong generalization ability.
conclusionThe XGBoost-fueled predictive model for post-surgery colon cancer patients proved highly effective. It underlined gastroparesis as a significant post-operative issue, associated with advanced age, prolonged surgeries, extensive intraoperative blood loss, surgical techniques, low serum protein levels, anemia, diabetes, and hypothyroidism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.