ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2024
[Workplace-related stress experience and mental health of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: risk and protective factors from the VOICE study].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric validation of a cognition and social participation bolt-on for the EQ-5D-5L in SARS-CoV-2 infected German healthcare workers.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- [Work-related psychological stress in the public health service during and after the COVID-19 pandemic and measures for reduction].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Article
- [The COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: mental health trajectories, resilient and vulnerable groups].Der Nervenarzt · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare workers have an increased risk of depression and anxiety, and medical staff have faced a wide variety of challenges, especially during the COVID-19-pandemic. The aim of the VOICE study was to investigate risk and protective factors for workplace-related stress experience and mental health.
methodA multicentre, web-based and prospective survey (VOICE study) was initiated in the spring of 2020 by a network of five psychosomatic university clinics (Erlangen, Ulm, Bonn, Cologne and Dresden). More than 25,000 respondents took part in the study at five measurement points.
resultsOf 3678 employees examined in a hospital setting during the first wave of the pandemic, 17.4% and 17.8% of physicians, 21.6% and 19.0% of nurses and 23.0% and 20.1% of medical-technical assistants (MTA) were affected by symptoms of depression and anxiety, respectively, to a clinically relevant extent. The most important risk factors for depressive and anxiety symptoms were insufficient relaxation during leisure time, increased alcohol consumption, lower trust in colleagues in difficult work situations and increased fear of becoming ill with COVID-19. Predictors for increased post-traumatic symptoms were increased generalized anxiety and depression as well as increased fear of infecting family members. Sense of coherence, social support, optimism and reward level acted as protective factors. DISCUSSION: The psychological effects of workplace-related stress during the pandemic were found to be significant. Therefore, regular mental health screening and prevention programmes for healthcare workers are indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.