Observational studySurgery today2025
Treatment selection pattern and prognostic factors in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer at recurrence: an observational study.
Observational study in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSociety is aging, and the proportion of older patients with lung cancer is increasing. However, the treatment choices and prognoses for older patients with cancer recurrence remain unclear. We retrospectively investigated the treatment choices and prognoses of older patients with recurrence.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 1100 patients who underwent complete resection for non-small cell lung cancer at Kitasato University Hospital between 2004 and 2017. Patients of ≥75 years of age were defined as older patients, and the prognosis and prognostic factors of these patients upon recurrence were examined.
resultsAmong the 290 patients who developed recurrence, 106 experienced recurrence at an older age. The factors associated with survival after recurrence included sex, time to recurrence, number of recurrences, performance status at recurrence, and active treatment. As the age at recurrence increased, the proportion of patients who did not receive active treatment increased, as did the proportion for whom the reason was the patient's and family's preferences.
conclusionsA considerable number of older patients who experience recurrence do not wish to receive active treatment. However, the prognosis can be improved by aggressive treatment for recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39331121What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.