Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39330987›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Dynamic Cellular Processes in Corneal Epithelium During Wound Healing in Cynomolgus Monkeys.

Ming Zhou, Zhuo-Xing Shi, Zhong Liu, Shu-Rui Ke, Chao-Yang Wang, Xiao-Lin Liang, Qiu-Ling Hu, Qi-Kai Zhang, Dong-Liang Wang, Li Sun and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ming ZhouState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Zhuo-Xing ShiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Zhong LiuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Shu-Rui KeState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Chao-Yang WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao-Lin LiangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Qiu-Ling HuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Qi-Kai ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Dong-Liang WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Li SunState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Yu-Heng LinState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.
Qi DaiCollege of Life Science and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.
Ying-Feng ZhengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Corneal wounding healing is critical for maintaining clear vision, however, a complete understanding of its dynamic regulatory mechanisms remains elusive. Here, we used single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to analyze the cellular activities and transcriptional changes of corneal limbal epithelial cells at different stages after wound healing in cynomolgus monkeys, which exhibit a closer transcriptomic similarity to humans. Methods: Corneal limbal tissues were collected during uninjured, 1-day and 3-day healing stages, dissociated into single cells, and subjected to scRNA-seq using the 10× Genomics platform. Cell types were clustered by graph-based visualization methods and unbiased computational analysis. Additionally, cell migration assays and immunofluorescent staining were performed on cultured human corneal epithelial cells. Results: We characterized nine cell clusters by scRNA-seq analysis of the cynomolgus monkey corneal epithelium. By comparing heterogeneous transcriptional changes in major cell types during corneal healing, we highlighted the importance of limbal epithelial cells (LEPCs) and basal epithelial cells (BEPCs) in extracellular matrix (ECM) formation and wound healing, as well as suprabasal epithelial cells (SEPCs) in epithelial differentiation during the healing processes. We further identified five different sub-clusters in LEPC, including the transit amplifying cell (TAC) sub-cluster that promotes early healing through the activation of thrombospondin-1 (THBS1) expression. Conclusions: Our study represents the first comprehensive exploration of the detailed transcriptome profile of individual corneal cells during the wound healing process in nonhuman primates. We demonstrate the intricate mechanisms involved in corneal healing and provide a promising avenue for potential therapies in corneal wound healing.

Indexed as

Epithelium, CornealMacaca fascicularisSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeWound HealingAnimalsCell MovementCells, CulturedCorneal InjuriesDisease Models, AnimalGene Expression ProfilingHumansLimbus CorneaeMale

Identifiers

PMID39330987
PMCPMC11437678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.