ReviewVeterinary sciences2024
Assisting the Learning of Clinical Reasoning by Veterinary Medical Learners with a Case Example.
Review in Veterinary sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustained Improvements in Student Outcomes Following Integration of Clinical Case Narratives in Veterinary Microbiology Curriculum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Why anesthetic protocols do not travel intact: hidden curriculum and local reasoning in small-animal veterinary anesthesia.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- An embodied cognition based model of medical experts' tacit knowledge: structure, hierarchies, and transformation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Clinical Reasoning Uncertainty in Veterinary Medical Encounters with a Clinical Example.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Bridging theory and practice: a facilitation-driven game for reflective, collaborative veterinary education.Irish veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Clinical Reasoning About Timely Euthanasia of Compromised Pigs.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Assisting the Learning of Clinical Reasoning by Veterinary Medical Learners with a Case Example.Veterinary sciences · 2024Review
- "Visual thinking strategies" improves radiographic observational skills but not chart interpretation in third and fourth year veterinary students.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective clinical reasoning is essential for veterinary medical education, particularly in managing complex cases. This review explores strategies for learning clinical reasoning by veterinary medical learners, using a case example of mastitis to illustrate key concepts. Clinical reasoning encompasses cognitive, metacognitive, social, and situational activities, yet the literature on practical applications in veterinary education remains limited. The review discusses various stages of clinical reasoning, including data collection, problem representation, differential diagnosis, and management planning. It emphasizes the importance of integrating client-centered care and iterative evaluation into the clinical decision-making process. Key learning strategies include facilitation in using the domains of clinical reasoning-concepts, data collection, and analysis, taking action, and reflection on encounters. This review highlights best practices such as forward and backward reasoning, reflective practice, and the use of practical examples to enhance learners' diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. The insights provided aim to enhance the training of veterinary learners, ensuring they can navigate day 1 as well as complex cases with improved diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.