ArticleToxics2024
Evaluation of Spontaneous Overtime Methemoglobin Formation in Post-Mortem Blood Samples from Real Cases in Critical Storage Conditions.
Article in Toxics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Double Fatal Sodium Nitrite Poisoning-Double Homicide, Extended Suicide, or Suicide and Accident?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Fatal Outcome of Suicidal Multi-Substance Ingestion Involving Sodium Nitrate and Nitrite Toxicity: A Case Report and Literature Review.Acta medica Lituanic · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nitrite/nitrate poisoning is an emerging problem, with an ongoing escalation of reported self-administration with suicidal intent in several countries. Nitrites toxicity mainly consists of their interaction with hemoglobin (Hb), causing its oxidization to methemoglobin (MetHb). In order to give support to the correct procedures for the analysis of these cases, this study aims to evaluate spontaneous sample degradation and consequent MetHb formation in the typical storage conditions of a forensic toxicology laboratory. Two different types of samples have been used in this study: the first stage of our study consisted of a retrospective analysis of blood samples obtained by judicial autopsies already stored in the toxicology laboratory, collected over four years (2018-2021), while the samples used for the second stage were appositely collected during judicial autopsies. The data obtained by the application of a derivative spectrophotometry method on these samples suggest that there seems not to be a maximum threshold for MetHb formation within which it is possible to state with a sufficient grade of certainty that the concentration of MetHb found is consistent with an ante-mortem formation and is not the result of an artifact due to sample degradation and storage conditions. On the other hand, the results suggest that MetHb formation depends on the time passed between sample collection and analysis, so that a tempestive sample processing, performed as soon as the samples are received in the laboratory, is crucial to obtain the maximum reliability and diagnostic values from the data when MetHb quantitation is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.